The Conceptual Classification of Environmental Racism
A Case Study with Insights on Disinformation Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/cad3f803Keywords:
Classification, Environmental Racism, Narratives, Disinformation, DiscourseAbstract
This paper explores the significant influence of classification systems on public discourse and policy responses, centered on a case study of the contentious narrative of environmental racism in Brazil during the heavy rains in Rio de Janeiro in January 2024. We emphasize that classification systems shape societal perceptions and actions concerning environmental injustices, revealing the underlying power dynamics and negotiations. Additionally, we argue the dispute about how the concept is classified shows that disinformation narratives are used as a powerful tool in the public debate. The study contrasts the perspectives of Anielle Franco, who advocates for systemic recognition of environmental injustices and government intervention, with Kim Kataguiri, who dismisses environmental racism as a fabricated concept aimed at disrupting existing power structures. In this context, “meaningful disinformation” emerges as a narrative strategy to influence the classification debate. The analysis explores pivotal concepts such as the evolution of race and property rights, the structural advantages conferred by whiteness, and the commodification of land, all of which perpetuate systemic inequalities. By examining these themes, the paper illustrates how historical and structural factors shape contemporary environmental injustices in Brazil. The findings suggest that the case study offers valuable contributions to the discussion on classification systems and environmental disinformation.
Downloads
References
Bastos dos Santos, J. G., & Chagas, V. (2018). Fucking right-wing: MBL’s personal frames and ultraliberal agenda. Matrizes, 12(3).
Bastos, M., & Tuters, M. (2023). Meaningful disinformation: Narrative rituals and affective folktales. Big Data & Society, 10(2).
Bento, C. (2022). O pacto da branquitude. Companhia das Letras
Bouqvar, N. (2022). Environmental racism and 2030 Agenda: An analysis of the municipality of Rio de
Janeiro (Master’s thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro).
Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies:
Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. Allen (Eds.), International
handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Springer.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
Bullard, R. D. (1993). Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots. South End Press.
Carneiro, S. (2023). Dispositivo de racialidade: A construção do outro como não ser como fundamento do
ser. Companhia das Letras.
Davis, A. (1983). Women, race & class. Vintage.
Deloria Jr, V. (2003). God is red: A native view of religion (3rd ed.). Fulcrum Publishing.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.
Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Graves, L. (2017). Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact
checking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 518–537.
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of
Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University, 1–15.
Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707–1791.
Hartinger, S. M., et al. (2023). The 2022 South America report of the Lancet Countdown on health and
climate change: Trust the science. Now that we know, we must act. The Lancet Regional Health – Americas.
Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform,
multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital
Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520.
Herculano, S. (2002). Riscos e desigualdade social: A temática da Justiça Ambiental e sua construção no
Brasil. Encontro da ANPPAS, 1–15.
Hong, S., & Hermann, S. N. (2020). Fuck your feelings: The affective weaponization of facts and reason.
In M. Paasonen, A. Kuntsman, & A. Karatzogianni (Eds.), Affective politics of digital media (pp. 86–100).
Routledge.
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2023). A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms. New Media
& Society, 26(1), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231161880
Lipsitz, G. (2006). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics
(Rev. ed.). Temple University Press.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling
and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
Recuero, R. (2024). A rede da desinformação: Sistemas, estruturas e dinâmicas nas plataformas de mídias
sociais. Editora Sulina.
Rio de Janeiro. (2024, January 31). Decreto n. 53.912. Dispõe sobre as competências da Secretaria
Municipal de Meio Ambiente e Clima - SMAC. http://leismunicipa.is/13rhz
Roberts, J. D., Dickinson, K. L., Hendriks, M. D., & Jennings, V. (2022). “I can’t breathe”: Examining the legacy of American racism on determinants of health and the ongoing pursuit of environmental justice.
Current Environmental Health Reports, 9, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00343-x
Rossette-Crake, F. (2025). When politicians follow in the steps of influencers: Social media oratory on
Instagram and the issue of political legitimacy. Discourse, Context & Media, 53, 100802.
Soares, F., & Volcan, T. (2024). Memes políticos, humor e eleições: O uso de memes como estratégia
de propagação no Twitter. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984
6398202417859
Solberg Søilen, K., & Huber, S. (2006). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured,
focused comparison. Lund Institute of Economic Research Working Paper Series, (1).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The problem of the environment. In J. G. Berman (Ed.), The collected works of L. S.
Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (Vol. 2, pp. 341–348). Springer.
Watts, N., et al. (2019). The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Ensuring
that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. The Lancet, 394(10211), 1836
1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9(June), 1–6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bárbara Tauffner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish their work for the first time under the Creative Commons licence, which allows the exchange of academic work and recognition of authorship in the journal.
