The Influence of cooperation network and network behavior on company performance
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.192.66307Résumé
This article aims to analyze the influence of the cooperation network structure and external network behavior on the performance of biscuit manufacturing companies in the city of São Tiago. Social network analysis and structural equation modeling were used as a method. The results show that external network behavior influences both performance and network structure. This highlights the importance of social networks in business dynamics, suggesting that relationship building can impact performance. This research represents a relevant contribution to the understanding of relationship networks, as there are no prior studies on external network behavior published in Brazil.
Téléchargements
Références
Abreu, J. C. (2002). Estratégia e oportunidades locais: Um estudo sobre rede dinâmica em aglomerados de empreendedores de base artesanal. [Tese de doutorado, Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro].
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Batjargal, B. (2010a). Network dynamics and new ventures in China: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802628864
Batjargal, B. (2010b). The effects of network’s structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 146-163.
Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287-295.
Birley, S. (1986). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107-117.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows – Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard Analytic Technologies.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–81.
Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 57-91). Harvard Business School Press.
Burt, R. S. (2001). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guillen et al. (Orgs.), New directions in economic sociology (Cap. 7, pp. 201-250). Russel Sage Foundation.
Burt, R. S., & Sonja, O. (2024). Guanxi and structural holes: Strong bridges from relational embedding. American Journal of Sociology, 131(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/730630
Burt, S. R., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Corrar, L. J., Paulo, E., & Dias Filho, J. M. (2009). Análise multivariada: Para os cursos de administração, ciências contábeis e economia. Atlas.
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B., Jr. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Ebbers, J. J. (2014). Networking behavior and contracting relationships among entrepreneurs in business incubators. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1159-1181.
Edelman, L., Brush, C., & Manolova, T. (2005). Co-alignment in the resource-performance relationship: Strategy as mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 359-383.
Ferreira, A. S., Mariz, S. R., & Rocha, E. M. P. (2021). Centralidade na rede e desempenho: Efeitos no setor automotivo. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 23(4), 677-695.
Ford, D., & Mouzas, S. (2013). The theory and practice of business networking. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 433–442.
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183-214.
Gruber, M. (2007). Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 782-807.
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652.
Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–93.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. Organization Studies, 23(4), 525-548.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/Introduction_to_Social_Network_Methods.pdf
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2008). Social networks and organizations. Sage Publications.
Klein, K. J., Tosi, H., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963.
Larson, A. (1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 173-188.
Larson, A. (1992). Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), p. 76-104.
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2023). The impact of the collaborative innovation network embeddedness on enterprise green innovation performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1190697
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1156.
Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151.
Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68(Jan.), 90-108.
Naudé, P., Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., & Thornton, S. C. (2014). The influence of network effects on SME performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(4), 630-641.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (2005). The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.49.66362
Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1994). Personal networks and firm competitive strategy – A strategic or coincidental match? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 281-305.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.
Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1996). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893935
Pereira, A. da S., Bigóis, L., & Oliveira, J. B. de. (2019). Modelagem de Equação Estrutural: Uma análise com o SMARTPLS 2.0 M3. (Texto para discussão). Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Administrativas e Contábeis, Universidade de Passo Fundo.
Powell, W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
Powell, W. W., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1999). Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In S. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Networks in and around organizations (special volume). JAI Press.
Quandt, C. O. (2012). Redes de cooperação e inovação localizada: Estudo de caso de um arranjo produtivo local. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 9(1), 141-166.
Resende, P. C., Moreira, V. A. S., & Gava, V. (2012). Proposição de um sistema de medição de desempenho para fábricas de biscoitos tradicionais em São Tiago (MG). XXXII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção, Bento Gonçalves, RS, Brasil.
Seiler, A., Papanagnou, C., & Scarf, P. (2020). On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107690
Shipilov, A. V. (2009). Firm scope experience, historic multimarket contact with partners, centrality, and the relationship between structural holes and performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0365
Spiro, E. S., Acton, R. M., & Butts, C. T. (2013). Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Social Networks, 35, 130–143.
Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.
Swiatowiec-Szczepanska, J., & Stępie, B. (2022). Impact of corporate network position on strategic risk and company’s performance – Evidence from Poland. Corporate Governance, 22(5), 947-978.
Tan, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2014). Network closure or structural hole? The conditioning effects of network-level social capital on innovation performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12102
Thornton, S., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2015). An empirical investigation of network-oriented behaviors in business-to-business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 167-180.
Udimal, T. B., Liu, E., & Lou, M. (2021). Network reliance and entrepreneurial performance, the role of external networking behaviour and entrepreneurial orientation: The case of rural farmer-entrepreneurs. Innovation & Management Review, 18(3), 308-330.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109-125.
Wang, H., Zhao, X., & Zhou, L. (2015). Network centrality, organizational innovation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(3), 146–159.
Wanga, W.-K., Yen, S.-H., & Huang, H.-J. (2021). Social networks and dynamic firm performance: Evidence from the Taiwanese semiconductor industry. Spanish Accounting Review, 24(1). https://www.doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.374161
Watson, J. (2007). Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 852–874.
Watts, D., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
Watts, H. D., Wood, A. M., & Wardle, P. (2006). Owner-managers, clusters and local embeddedness: Small firms in the Sheffield (UK) metal-working cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(3), 185–205.
Wincent, J. (2005). Does size matter?: A study of firm behavior and outcomes in strategic SME networks. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(3), 437-453.
Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2006). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Networkingskala. Diagnostica, 52(4), 161–180.
Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2009). Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 196–206.
Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2010). Do specific types of networking predict specific mobility outcomes? A two-year prospective study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 238–245.
Wolff, H.-G., & Spurk, D. (2020). Developing and validating a Short Networking Behavior Scale (SNBS) from Wolff and Moser’s (2006) measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719844924
Zacharias, N. A., Daldere, D., & Hinz, O. (2023). Which collaborations allow firms to become gatekeepers? A longitudinal analysis of a large-scale collaboration network. European Management Journal, 41, 263–273.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm abilities, structural holes and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.
Zhang, L., Fu, Y., Wang, Z., Tang, H., & Zhou, B. (2023). How do heterogeneous networks affect a firm’s innovation performance? A research analysis based on clustering and classification. Entropy, 25, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25111560
Ziani-Franclet, Z. (2020). Networking behaviors under the microscope: Examining networking actions from different perspectives. [Doctoral dissertation, CY Cergy Paris Université], CY Cergy Paris Université]. https://www.theorgplumber.com/publication/dissert/dissertation.pdf
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
A Revista usa o CC BY. Essa licença permite que outras pessoas distribuam, remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, desde que sejam creditadas pela criação original. Essa é a licença mais flexível oferecida. Recomendado para máxima disseminação e uso de materiais licenciados.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), sempre com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
A Revista ulitiliza o DOI (Digital Object Identifier ) desde 2007 O DOI com a finalidade de autenticar cada artigo, portanto seu conteúdo digital.

