The objective of this study is to analyze perceptions of academic dishonesty in the use of ChatGPT among undergraduate Accounting students and professors. The research is characterized as descriptive and quantitative, and data were collected through a questionnaire adapted from Fróes and Silva (2022). The results indicate that there is no significant difference between students’ and professors’ perceptions of academic dishonesty regarding the use of the ChatGPT tool in undergraduate Accounting programs in Brazil. Differences in perception between professors and students were concentrated in cases of dishonesty and gray-area situations.
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.194.70517Résumé
The objective of this study is to analyze perceptions of academic dishonesty in the use of ChatGPT among undergraduate Accounting students and professors. The research is characterized as descriptive and quantitative, and data were collected through a questionnaire adapted from Fróes and Silva (2022). The results indicate that there is no significant difference between students’ and professors’ perceptions of academic dishonesty regarding the use of the ChatGPT tool in undergraduate Accounting programs in Brazil. Differences in perception between professors and students were concentrated in cases of dishonesty and gray-area situations.
Téléchargements
Références
Abdo-Salloum, A. M., & Al-Mousawi, H. Y. (2025). Accounting Students’ technology readiness, perceptions, and digital competence toward artificial intelligence adoption in accounting curricula. Journal of Accounting Education, 70, 100951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100951
Abouammoh, N., Alhasan, K., Aljamaan, F., Raina, R., Malki, K. H., Altamimi, I., ... & Temsah, M. H. (2025). Perceptions and earliest experiences of medical students and faculty with ChatGPT in medical education: qualitative study. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e63400. https://doi.org/10.2196/63400
Aguiar, T. R. S. (2024). ChatGPT: reflections from the UK higher education institutions, accountancy bodies and BIG4s. Accounting Research Journal, 37(3), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-07-2023-0184
Alves, J. N., & Faria, B. L. (2023). Impacto do ChatGPT no ensino e aprendizagem: transformando paradigmas e abordagens. Revista Cocar, 18(36), 1-6. https://periodicos.uepa.br/index.php/cocar/article/view/6607
Alves, M. A., Silva, C. A. T., & Bonfim, M. P. (2024). ChatGPT e desonestidade acadêmica: percepção dos estudantes de contabilidade sobre o seu uso. Revista Universitária da América Latina, 17(3), 133-152. https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/gual/article/view/99115
Ballantine, J., Boyce, G., & Stoner, G. (2024). A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99, 102711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102711
Braun, R. L., & Stallworth, H. L. (2009). The academic honesty expectations gap: an analysis of student and faculty perceptions. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 19. https://www.aejournal.com/ojs/index.php/aej/article/view/95
Bui, H. Q., Phan, Q. T. B., & Nguyen, H. T. (2025). AI adoption: a new perspective from accounting students in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabes-06-2024-0300
Chen, K., Tallant, A. C., & Selig, I. (2025). Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: Student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1-2), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160
Dosumu, O., Porumb, V., Stafford, A., & Zimmer, A. (2025). In the wake of ChatGPT: early reflections on marking open-book online accounting assessments. Accounting Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2487487
Fachrurrozie, F., Nurkhin, A., Santoso, J. T. B., Mukhibad, H., & Wolor, C. W. (2025). Exploring the use of artificial intelligence in Indonesian accounting classes. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2448053
Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados. Elsevier.
Ferhataj, A., Memaj, F., Sahatcija, R., Ora, A., & Koka, E. (2025). Ethical concerns in AI development: analyzing students’ perspectives on robotics and society. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2024-0111
Ferreira, R. C. V., Garcia, G. H. M., & Brasil, D. R. (2023). O surgimento do ChatGPT e a insegurança sobre o futuro de trabalhos acadêmicos. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 21, 130–143. https://zenodo.org/record/8043807
Fróes, R. C., & Silva, D. M. (2022). Variáveis demográficas versus desonestidade acadêmica nos cursos de pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em ciências contábeis. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 41(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v41i1.53737
Fróes, R. C., & Silva, D. M. da. (2021). Academic dishonesty in stricto sensu postgraduate programs in accounting. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32(87), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113260
Han, B., Nawaz, S., Buchanan, G., & McKay, D. (2025). Students’ perceptions: exploring the interplay of ethical and pedagogical impacts for adopting AI in higher education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00456-4
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, J., Klopfer, M., Grohs, J. R., Eldardiry, H., Weichert, J., Cox, L. A., & Pike, D. (2025). Examining faculty and student perceptions of generative AI in university courses. Innovative Higher Education, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w
Lo, C.K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ. Sci., 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lopes, A. (2024, 5 de setembro). OpenAI alcança 1 milhão usuários corporativos de ChatGPT. Exame. https://exame.com/inteligencia-artificial/openai-alcanca-1-milhao-de-usuarios-pagos-corporativos-para-o-chatgpt/
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
Mbewe, G. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Lecturers' and Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Case Study of Nkhoma University, Malawi. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5361262
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
Molnar, K. K. (2015). Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty: A Nine-Year Study from 2005 to 2013. Journal of Academic Ethics, v. 13, n. 2, p. 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9231-9
Naseer, M. A., Saeed, S., Afzal, A., Ali, S., & Malik, M. G. R. (2025). Navigating the integration of artificial intelligence in the medical education curriculum: a mixed-methods study exploring the perspectives of medical students and faculty in Pakistan. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06552-2
Oliveira Neto, K. D., & Chacarolli Junior, O. (2013). A visão da honestidade acadêmica de professores e alunos de um curso superior em contabilidade. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 10(4), 324-339. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3372/337229732004/html/
Oliveira, A. C. L., Assis, A. I. R., Silva, D. M., & Oliveira Neto, J. D. (2014). Percepção dos discentes e docentes acerca da honestidade acadêmica em um curso de Ciências Contábeis. Revista Economia & Gestão, 14(34), 86-118. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2014v14n34p86
Olson, J., Thiel, L., Ko, A., Mason, J., & Olla, P. (2025). Nurse Anesthesia Student and Faculty Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Nurse Anesthesia Education. https://doi.org/10.63524/jnae.129203
Pavela, G. (1997) Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity. Journal of College and University Law, v. 24, n. 1, p. 97-119.
Pimenta, M. A. A. (2010). Fraude em avaliações na visão de professores e de estudantes: uma reflexão sobre formação profissional e ética. RPD – Revista Profissão Docente, 10 (22), p. 124–138. https://doi.org/10.31496/rpd.v10i22.187
Rahman, M.M.; & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: opportunities, threats, and strategies. Appl. Sci., 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
Robiños, J. R. O., Binhamza, M. H., Casyao, I. M., Combis, H., Melgar, S. M., Sora, L., & Austria, Ma. G. (2024). Examining Attitudes and Perceived Usefulness of AI Integration in Teaching and Learning Processes. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0591
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Zahid, H. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3691-3716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9
Zhu, W., Huang, L., Zhou, X., Li, X., Shi, G., Ying, J., & Wang, C. (2025). Could AI ethical anxiety, perceived ethical risks and ethical awareness about AI influence university students’ use of generative AI products? An ethical perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(1), 742-764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
A Revista usa o CC BY. Essa licença permite que outras pessoas distribuam, remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, desde que sejam creditadas pela criação original. Essa é a licença mais flexível oferecida. Recomendado para máxima disseminação e uso de materiais licenciados.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), sempre com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
A Revista ulitiliza o DOI (Digital Object Identifier ) desde 2007 O DOI com a finalidade de autenticar cada artigo, portanto seu conteúdo digital.
