Digital territories

Co-creation, belonging, and inequalities in local consumption on Instagram

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.194.69828

Abstract

The growing platformization of social interactions has transformed neighborhood Instagram pages into digital arenas of co-creation, consumption, and belonging, while also reproducing territorial inequalities. This study aims to understand how these pages operate as digital territories of co-creation, engagement, and inclusion, simultaneously influencing local consumption and community relations. A qualitative exploratory and descriptive approach was adopted, combining netnography of six neighborhood pages in Fortaleza, semi-structured interviews with local business owners, and ethnographic field notes. The findings reveal five core dimensions: (1) digital co-creation of territorial narratives, (2) relational consumption sustained by affective bonds, (3) communicational inclusion through accessible formats, (4) construction of symbolic value and belonging, and (5) digital inequalities mediated by financial capital and technical skills. The study advances the concept of co-creation by integrating territorial and affective dimensions of digital culture, offering an interpretive typology for analyzing platformized community ecosystems. It also provides practical insights for digital inclusion policies and the strengthening of local economies by emphasizing the need for inclusive curation and capacity-building initiatives to enhance small entrepreneurs’ presence and visibility online. We conclude that neighborhood pages function as hybrid platforms of visibility, inclusion, and symbolic contestation, offering new perspectives for understanding digitally mediated local consumption and for designing policies that foster neighborhood-based economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Edilania Miranda Conrado, UECE

    Mestre em Administração pela Universidade do Estado do Ceará - UECE. Formada em Processos Gerenciais pelo Centro Universitário Christus - UNICHRISTUS, com Especialização em MBA de Gestão de Pessoas e liderança. Atua na área administrativa acadêmica universitária desde 2013, atuando atualmente como Assistente de Pesquisador Institucional com sólida experiência na elaboração e suporte de relatórios e projetos de pesquisa acadêmica e institucional, em relação aos processos de avaliação de cursos da educação superior. Tem como áreas de interesse: Administração, Educação e Novas Tecnologias.

  • Felipe Gerhard, UECE

    Possui graduação em Administração pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará (2011), mestrado em Administração pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará (2015) e Doutorado em Administração pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará (2019), com período sanduíche financiado pelo Programa PDSE/Capes em Université du Quebec à Montréal (Orientador: Raoul Graf) e co-tutela em Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Orientador: Eliane Pereira Zamith Brito). Tem experiência na área de Administração, com ênfase em Administração de Empresas, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Marketing, Comportamento do Consumidor e Métodos Qualitativos.

References

Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626

Cahyono, E. D. (2023). Instagram adoption for local food transactions: A research framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122215

Carpenter, J., Horvath, C., & Spencer, B. (2021). Co-creation as an agonistic practice in the favela of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro. Urban Studies, 58(9), 1906–1923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020915282

Cheung, M. L., Pires, G. D., Rosenberger, P. J., Leung, W. K. S., & Ting, H. (2020). Investigating the role of social media marketing on value co-creation and engagement: An empirical study in China and Hong Kong. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.006

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.

Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Mahr, D., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2014). The value of customer co-created knowledge during the innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12116

Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third places and the social life of streets. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 779–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677

Miller, D., D’Agostino, G., & Matera, V. (2019). Come il mondo ha cambiato i social media: An Italian translation of how the world changed social media. UCL Press.

Minayo, M. C. de S. (2001). Pesquisa social: Teoria, método e criatividade (18ª ed.). Vozes.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001

Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015

Schöps, J., Reinhardt, C., & Hemetsberger, A. (2022). Sticky market webs of connection: Human and nonhuman market co-codification dynamics across social media. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2020-0750

Schradie, J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx041

Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Wiley.

Utami, H., Alamanos, E., & Kuznesof, S. (2021). ‘A social justice logic’: How digital commerce enables value co-creation at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(7-8), 816–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1908399

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & Wall, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 3(3), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2018-03-03-08

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6

Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162

Published

2026-03-27

Issue

Section

Artigos/Papers