Digital territories
Co-creation, belonging, and inequalities in local consumption on Instagram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.194.69828Abstract
The growing platformization of social interactions has transformed neighborhood Instagram pages into digital arenas of co-creation, consumption, and belonging, while also reproducing territorial inequalities. This study aims to understand how these pages operate as digital territories of co-creation, engagement, and inclusion, simultaneously influencing local consumption and community relations. A qualitative exploratory and descriptive approach was adopted, combining netnography of six neighborhood pages in Fortaleza, semi-structured interviews with local business owners, and ethnographic field notes. The findings reveal five core dimensions: (1) digital co-creation of territorial narratives, (2) relational consumption sustained by affective bonds, (3) communicational inclusion through accessible formats, (4) construction of symbolic value and belonging, and (5) digital inequalities mediated by financial capital and technical skills. The study advances the concept of co-creation by integrating territorial and affective dimensions of digital culture, offering an interpretive typology for analyzing platformized community ecosystems. It also provides practical insights for digital inclusion policies and the strengthening of local economies by emphasizing the need for inclusive curation and capacity-building initiatives to enhance small entrepreneurs’ presence and visibility online. We conclude that neighborhood pages function as hybrid platforms of visibility, inclusion, and symbolic contestation, offering new perspectives for understanding digitally mediated local consumption and for designing policies that foster neighborhood-based economies.
Downloads
References
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626
Cahyono, E. D. (2023). Instagram adoption for local food transactions: A research framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122215
Carpenter, J., Horvath, C., & Spencer, B. (2021). Co-creation as an agonistic practice in the favela of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro. Urban Studies, 58(9), 1906–1923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020915282
Cheung, M. L., Pires, G. D., Rosenberger, P. J., Leung, W. K. S., & Ting, H. (2020). Investigating the role of social media marketing on value co-creation and engagement: An empirical study in China and Hong Kong. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.006
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Mahr, D., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2014). The value of customer co-created knowledge during the innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12116
Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third places and the social life of streets. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 779–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677
Miller, D., D’Agostino, G., & Matera, V. (2019). Come il mondo ha cambiato i social media: An Italian translation of how the world changed social media. UCL Press.
Minayo, M. C. de S. (2001). Pesquisa social: Teoria, método e criatividade (18ª ed.). Vozes.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Schöps, J., Reinhardt, C., & Hemetsberger, A. (2022). Sticky market webs of connection: Human and nonhuman market co-codification dynamics across social media. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2020-0750
Schradie, J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx041
Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Wiley.
Utami, H., Alamanos, E., & Kuznesof, S. (2021). ‘A social justice logic’: How digital commerce enables value co-creation at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(7-8), 816–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1908399
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & Wall, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 3(3), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2018-03-03-08
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with simultaneously license under the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharing the paper with acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to take additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (eg, publish in institutional repository or publish as a chapter of a book), always with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

