Disconnecting digitally beyond working hours: a legal and comparative study on the right to disconnect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15175/nnvvw838Keywords:
right to disconnect, work-life balance, labour laws, telework and mental wellbeingAbstract
Purpose: The study examines the emergence of the Right to disconnect as a resolution to workplace digital connectivity issues. It explores the legal, constitutional, and ethical aspects of this right, comparing the standards of work-life balance. The study mainly emphasizes the legal recognition and implementation of the Right to disconnect to promote work-life balance, mental health, and the dignity of labor in a digital and remote-working environment, outlining the negative effects of constant connectivity on employee well-being. Design / Methodology: The research uses a doctrinal legal approach to focus on the statutes, court decisions, academic literature, and international legal frameworks relating to the Right to disconnect. Comparative analysis evaluates France, Germany, Italy, and Spain’s laws and policies in relation to India. A constitutional interpretation of Indian law, specifically Article 21, is used to determine whether this right can be incorporated into domestic law. Practical Implication: In a digital work culture, India requires a well-defined legislative framework to guarantee employees’ right to disconnect, supporting policy reforms that encourage work-life balance, mental health, and their impact on well-being. The study also helps policymakers, employers, and HR managers to take note of employee well-being and the framework code of work accordingly. Findings/Outcome: The research indicates that the Right to disconnect is required for preserving employees’ mental health, ensuring and increasing productivity, and work-life equilibrium in the digital era. In India, despite constitutional provisions supporting this freedom, there is a lack of clear legislation and guidelines for the corporate to disconnect the employee after leaving the workstation.
Downloads
References
BHARUCHA, Timir Jayesh. Telework intensity, work–family conflict, and work–family balance, during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2021. 176 f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy - PhD) - St. Mary's University, Texas, 2021. https://commons.stmarytx.edu/dissertations/49/
BLANPAIN, Roger et al. The global workplace: international and comparative employment law-cases and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/47858/frontmatter/9780521847858_frontmatter.pdf. Access on: May 10, 2025.
CHENG, Ivy. Protection of labour rights of “gig workers” in selected places. The Legislative Council Commission, May 26, 2020. Available at: https://app7.legco.gov.hk/rpdb/en/uploads/2019-2020/IN/IN10_19-20_20200526_en.pdf. Access on: May 20, 2025.
CHESLEY, Noelle. Families in a high-tech age: technology usage patterns, work and family correlates, and gender. Journal of Family Issues, v. 27 n. 5, p. 587-608, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05285187
DUTTON, William H. 2004. Social transformation in an information society: rethinking access to you and the world. Paris: UNESCO, 2004. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000152004. Access on: May 13, 2025.
GOLDING, Gabreille. The right to disconnect in Australia: creating space for a new term implied by law. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, v. 46 n. 2, p. 728-757, 2023. Available at: https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2023/23.html. Access on: May 20, 2025.
JOSSERAND, Emmanuel; BOERSMA, Martijn. Australia’s right to disconnect from work: beyond rhetoric and towards implementation. Journal of Industrial Relations, v. 66, n. 5, p. 703-720, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241290625
KURZYNOGA, Małgorzata. The right to disconnect: rest in the digital age of work from the international, european and polish law perspectives. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, v. 107, p. 83-94, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.107.06
MÜLLER, Klaus. The right to disconnect. European Parliamentary Research Service, July 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/642847/EPRS_BRI(2020)642847_EN.pdf. Access on: May 18, 2025.
PETITTA, Laura; Ghezzi, Valerio. Remote, disconnected, or detached? Examining the effects of psychological disconnectedness and cynicism on employee performance, wellbeing, and work–family interface. International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 20, n. 13, 6318, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136318
ŠMITE, Darja et al. From forced working-from-home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: two revolutions in telework. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 195, art. 111509, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111509
TRUJILLO PONS, Francisco; MEGINO FERNÁNDEZ, Diego. Mental health and the right to digital disconnection at work: a panoramic vision from the spanish experience and the recent approaches of the European Parliament. Labor Law Journal, DTR_Articles, p. 79-90, Summer 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10234/203985
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Passages: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A compromise transferring the copyright is requested, with the author’s signature, as the example below:
I / Us, ..................... , author(s) of the article/review: ................................, which
I/we have submitted to the appreciation of ‘Passagens: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture”, am/are aware of the publishing rules and
agree that the copyright related to it is transferred to the Publishing. I (we) take full responsibility for the content of this article; and is will contribute to the Editors to undertake the changes suggested by the evaluators and the review of bibliographic quotations.
__________________, ____/_____
Signature: ________________________________
