Disconnecting digitally beyond working hours: a legal and comparative study on the right to disconnect

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.15175/nnvvw838

Mots-clés :

right to disconnect, work-life balance, labour laws, telework and mental wellbeing

Résumé

Purpose: The study examines the emergence of the Right to disconnect as a resolution to workplace digital connectivity issues. It explores the legal, constitutional, and ethical aspects of this right, comparing the standards of work-life balance. The study mainly emphasizes the legal recognition and implementation of the Right to disconnect to promote work-life balance, mental health, and the dignity of labor in a digital and remote-working environment, outlining the negative effects of constant connectivity on employee well-being. Design / Methodology: The research uses a doctrinal legal approach to focus on the statutes, court decisions, academic literature, and international legal frameworks relating to the Right to disconnect. Comparative analysis evaluates France, Germany, Italy, and Spain’s laws and policies in relation to India. A constitutional interpretation of Indian law, specifically Article 21, is used to determine whether this right can be incorporated into domestic law. Practical Implication: In a digital work culture, India requires a well-defined legislative framework to guarantee employees’ right to disconnect, supporting policy reforms that encourage work-life balance, mental health, and their impact on well-being. The study also helps policymakers, employers, and HR managers to take note of employee well-being and the framework code of work accordingly. Findings/Outcome: The research indicates that the Right to disconnect is required for preserving employees’ mental health, ensuring and increasing productivity, and work-life equilibrium in the digital era. In India, despite constitutional provisions supporting this freedom, there is a lack of clear legislation and guidelines for the corporate to disconnect the employee after leaving the workstation.

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Biographies de l'auteur-e

  • Sharad Kumar PANDEY, Symbiosis International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

    Dr. Sharad Kumar Pandey is an Assistant Professor at Symbiosis Law School, Noida Campus, under Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. With a strong academic and research background, Dr. Pandey contributes significantly to legal education through teaching, scholarly publications, and active engagement in academic development. His research interests span across key areas of law, and he is committed to nurturing future legal professionals. Dr. Pandey is also listed on ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3798-0757, where his research contributions are catalogued.

  • Ravi DUBEY, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Dr. Ravi Dubey is a practicing Advocate associated with Maahir Associates – Legal Solution, based in Lucknow, India. He brings extensive legal expertise and practical experience to his work, offering comprehensive legal solutions across diverse areas of law. Known for his commitment to client advocacy and legal research, Dr. Dubey actively contributes to the legal community through both practice and scholarship. His academic and professional contributions are documented on ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5520-1923.

  • Arpit SHARMA, National Forensic Sciences University, Campus de Delhi, Nova Delhi, Delhi, Índia.

    Dr. Arpit Sharma is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India. He is dedicated to legal education and research, with a strong academic background and an active role in mentoring law students. Dr. Sharma's areas of interest include contemporary legal issues and interdisciplinary approaches to legal studies. He is committed to contributing to legal scholarship and curriculum development. His academic work and research outputs are available through his ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-260X. He can be reached at arpitt.sharmaa@gmail.com.

Références

BHARUCHA, Timir Jayesh. Telework intensity, work–family conflict, and work–family balance, during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2021. 176 f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy - PhD) - St. Mary's University, Texas, 2021. https://commons.stmarytx.edu/dissertations/49/

BLANPAIN, Roger et al. The global workplace: international and comparative employment law-cases and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/47858/frontmatter/9780521847858_frontmatter.pdf. Access on: May 10, 2025.

CHENG, Ivy. Protection of labour rights of “gig workers” in selected places. The Legislative Council Commission, May 26, 2020. Available at: https://app7.legco.gov.hk/rpdb/en/uploads/2019-2020/IN/IN10_19-20_20200526_en.pdf. Access on: May 20, 2025.

CHESLEY, Noelle. Families in a high-tech age: technology usage patterns, work and family correlates, and gender. Journal of Family Issues, v. 27 n. 5, p. 587-608, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05285187

DUTTON, William H. 2004. Social transformation in an information society: rethinking access to you and the world. Paris: UNESCO, 2004. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000152004. Access on: May 13, 2025.

GOLDING, Gabreille. The right to disconnect in Australia: creating space for a new term implied by law. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, v. 46 n. 2, p. 728-757, 2023. Available at: https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2023/23.html. Access on: May 20, 2025.

JOSSERAND, Emmanuel; BOERSMA, Martijn. Australia’s right to disconnect from work: beyond rhetoric and towards implementation. Journal of Industrial Relations, v. 66, n. 5, p. 703-720, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241290625

KURZYNOGA, Małgorzata. The right to disconnect: rest in the digital age of work from the international, european and polish law perspectives. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, v. 107, p. 83-94, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.107.06

MÜLLER, Klaus. The right to disconnect. European Parliamentary Research Service, July 9, 2020. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/642847/EPRS_BRI(2020)642847_EN.pdf. Access on: May 18, 2025.

PETITTA, Laura; Ghezzi, Valerio. Remote, disconnected, or detached? Examining the effects of psychological disconnectedness and cynicism on employee performance, wellbeing, and work–family interface. International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 20, n. 13, 6318, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136318

ŠMITE, Darja et al. From forced working-from-home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: two revolutions in telework. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 195, art. 111509, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111509

TRUJILLO PONS, Francisco; MEGINO FERNÁNDEZ, Diego. Mental health and the right to digital disconnection at work: a panoramic vision from the spanish experience and the recent approaches of the European Parliament. Labor Law Journal, DTR_Articles, p. 79-90, Summer 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10234/203985

Téléchargements

Publié

2026-01-31

Comment citer

Disconnecting digitally beyond working hours: a legal and comparative study on the right to disconnect. (2026). Revue Internationale d´Histoire Politique E Culture Juridique, 18(1), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.15175/nnvvw838